by sebastiankirsch - 2006-07-03 08:30
by strulli - 2006-07-07 03:10
by ccidral - 2006-07-06 04:43
by nocturnal - 2006-07-06 02:57
by rickcarson - 2006-07-05 17:04
by fmengue - 2006-07-05 06:21
by tommi_kuenneth - 2006-07-04 08:54
by jwenting - 2006-07-05 23:05
Let's hope I'll never have the displeasure of having to maintain code created by you or having to work in an environment influenced by you.
by tommi_kuenneth - 2006-07-06 08:39
by sebastiankirsch - 2006-07-04 11:00
No searching for and evaluating products.
That says just everything...
by tommi_kuenneth - 2006-07-06 08:52
by evickroy - 2006-07-03 08:36
by prunge - 2006-07-02 15:58
by robilad - 2006-07-02 07:44
The Mustang spec lead may want to consider the advantages of committing himself to keeping the JDK *Reference Implementation* free from APIs and libraries that are outside JCP's specification process, and having a separate product for Sun's own proprietary extensions to the JDK RI.
by firefight - 2006-07-01 08:14
by jwenting - 2006-07-05 04:01
It doesn't solve any problem, it adds a lot of crud to the distribution that almost noone will ever look at. Only people it's useful for may be marketeers who can now claim that Java has an embedded database just like .NET can access MS Access files natively.
by prime21 - 2006-07-01 07:29
by damnhandy - 2006-07-01 06:44
by bharathch - 2006-06-30 22:55
by sebastiankirsch - 2006-06-30 12:20
by rabbe - 2006-06-30 21:17
by hithacker - 2006-07-01 07:51
by jwenting - 2006-07-05 23:03
by maheshjaiswal - 2006-07-03 01:16
Your use of this web site or any of its content or software indicates your agreement to be bound by these Terms of Participation.
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.