Posted by editor
on July 7, 2012 at 6:14 AM PDT
Our recently completed poll about the Adopt OpenJDK project suggests that the project is gaining some visibility among Java developers, but there's a large group that isn't all that familiar with the project...
Our recently completed poll about the Adopt OpenJDK project suggests that the project is gaining some visibility among Java developers, but there's a large group that isn't all that familiar with the project. A total of 428 votes were cast. The exact question and results were:
What's your view of the Adopt OpenJDK project?
- 17% (74 votes) - It's a great idea - I plan to participate
- 7% (29 votes) - It's a great idea, but I probably won't participate
- 2% (7 votes) - It's probably a good thing
- 1% (3 votes) - I don't think it will gain much
- 18% (77 votes) - What's the Adopt OpenJDK project?
- 3% (13 votes) - I don't know
- 53% (225 votes) - Other
The Adopt OpenJDK project is so new that the high number of people who selected the non-specific options perhaps should not surprise us. The results (which, of course, are not scientific) imply that the news about AdoptOpenJDK's existence has not yet expanded such that the general developer is aware of it.
Among the voters who expressed knowledge about what the Adopt OpenJDK project is, a significant majority consider the project a great idea, including a large group of developers who applaud the project even though they doubt they'll personally be participating in it.
Projects like Adopt OpenJDK and Adopt-a-JSR , along with the JCP.next effort, are the cutting edge of an attempt to transform the way Java evolves from a fairly closed system where a few people make all the decisions (what it's been in the past) into an open, community-driven process, where anyone can participate, all the key discussions are public, anyone can submit comments, etc.
How can this be a bad thing? Well, yes, 10 Million Java developers all speaking out simultaneously would be a problem. But, that's unlikely to happen.
The fact is: the world has changed. In today's world, people like to be able to customize their own systems. Allowing developers to participate in the future evolution of Java and the JVM brings Java into the modern context of customer-driven product enhancement. That's a very good thing for Java's future, in my view. In fact, without these changes, I think Java would likely stagnate.
New poll: how long before JavaFX dominates?
Our new Java.net poll asks How long will it take for JavaFX to become the most widely used development platform for Java client/desktop apps? . Voting will be open until Friday, July 20.
Since my last blog post , two people have posted new java.net blogs :
Our latest Java.net Spotlight is Guillaume Laforge's report, Groovy 2.0 Released :
The Groovy development team and SpringSource are happy to echo the announcement of the release of Groovy 2.0 , the highly popular dynamic language for the Java platform. The key highlights of this important milestone are...
Previously, we featured Zoran Pavlović's Zoran Pavlović: Top 5 JavaFX Tutorials for June 2012 :
This month was pretty busy for me, I wrote a lot of JavaFX tutorials and few other articles. I had a lot of visits this month on this blog. So, I decide to share top 5 JavaFX 2 tutorials for this month...
Our latest Java.net article is Ken Rimple's Spring Roo and WebFlow . The article is the first in a series that will explore how Spring Roo integrates (and doesn't) with various technologies. This first article discusses Roo and Spring Web Flow.
Subscriptions and Archives: You can subscribe to this blog using the java.net Editor's Blog Feed . You can also subscribe to the Java Today RSS feed and the java.net blogs feed . You can find historical archives of what has appeared the front page of Java.net in the java.net home page archive .
-- Kevin Farnham