Posted by kalali
on April 1, 2010 at 12:15 PM PDT
Once again the FUD around Solaris and OpenSolaris fate started to spread after Dana Blankenhorn miss understood the licensing terms and used a eye catching and visitor increasing title, Oracle taking back OpenSolaris , for his blog entry. Well, from this article we can get that even the veteran writers can get things wrong and spread incorrect news :-)
Once again the FUD around Solaris and OpenSolaris fate started to spread after Dana Blankenhorn misunderstood the licensing terms and used a eye catching and visitor increasing title, Oracle taking back OpenSolaris , for his blog entry. Well, from this article we can get that even the veteran writers can get things wrong and spread incorrect news :-)
Folks, Solairs is one of the biggest Sun assets that Oracle is now own by taking over Sun . Solaris and OpenSolaris are going to be around in a much better shape than before because Oracle is betting its fight for the market share on this operating system to form a complete stack including storage, hardware, OS, middle-ware, support and so on.
Oracle may change the licensing terms for the Solaris OS, which is the Commercial distribution of OpenSolaris (with some added/ removed components) supported by Sun in old era, but to close the OpenSolaris code-base, no way. Changing the licensing terms can be result of Oracle seeking a higher revenue stream from the product and I bet Oracle will be able to get more out of Solaris than Sun because of its powerful marketing department :-P
Looking at the these FUD from any angel tells you that they are not correct because of at least the following reasons:
- OpenSolaris has a large community around it which Oracle do not like to send away.
- The Solaris/ OpenSolaris adoption highly increased after Sun pushed the source codes into OpenSolaris project. The whole Solaris on Z architecture, adoption of OpenSolaris increased so adoption of Solaris itself. Long story short, just take a look at http://www.genunix.org/ and http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Main/downloads to see how many active distributions are based on OpenSolaris core.
- Solaris/ OpenSolaris is more important to Oracle to let it fall apart because it has a lot to offer in Oracle strategy of offering end to end stack of its own.
People are talking about why the 2010.3 release is not released when it is already first days of April, the answer is "A few more weeks of development and testing will gives us a more stable OS" if you want to check the latest features which will be included in the 2010.3, grab the latest build (which is build 134 right now) from http://www.genunix.org/dist/indiana/ and play with it, but keep it in mind the build is not production ready yet. If you want the source code of OpenSolaris, take a look at http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Main/get to get the source code and build the OS yourself.
I am wondering what these people are getting from spreading wrong words and incorrect news about thins they have no clue about. Folks, Solaris OS is not OpenSolaris. OpenSolaris is CCDL licensed (except for some parts which are not CCDLed (http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Main/no_source ) while the Solaris distribution contains some of OpenSolaris components and features. some value added components and well along with some license/ distribution fees and first class support from Oracle.
Well, it was my personal feelings about the whole issue of OpenSolaris/ Solaris FUDs flying around.