Posted by evanx
on May 15, 2006 at 2:16 AM PDT
In his blog, Damien Katz wrote on "Signs you are a crappy programmer, and don't know it." At the top of the list is, "Java is all you'll ever need." Since i'm guilty of that, here is my response - why i choose not to add other languages to my toolbox.
In his blog , Damien Katz wrote on "Signs you are a crappy programmer, and don't know it." At the top of the list is "Java is all you'll ever need." Since i'm guilty of that, here is my response - why i choose not to add other languages to my toolbox.
So you have some system task to do. This is where you jump into vi and hack together a bash, python or perl script to accomplish this task in quick (and dirty) way, right?
This first problem for me is that this means leaving my Netbeans environment. These days I'd rather go to the dentist for root canal than do that.
Like most people, I guess I don't like going to the dentist. It does have one advantage though, which is if you aren't enjoying your job, you can schedule the dentist in the late afternoon and leave work early. Which i did regularly one year, when i wasn't enjoying my job, and had to go to the dentist a few times for a nagging pain. For my perly whites. Yes, I was using Perl at the time, and vi. So I'd be in that dentist's chair, with the drill screeching in my ears, and thinking, "Ah, what a pleasure not to be at work right now!"
So faced with some small task for which the sharpest drill is python, we should use that because in Java it takes "more lines" of code? No, sorry, I'm gonna take the 5th Netbeans amendment. When all you use is Netbeans, everything starts looking like being nailed.
So I choose Netbeans, to build up a library of support classes for various archetypes of tasks, eg. system tasks. This sharpens my skills in Java in different elements of the standard libraries, eg. System and Runtime. And it keeps me "thinking in Java."
I'm obsessive compulsive about code. Happily Netbeans lets me rename things, to keep my code "clean." Writing in python and C, I get an immediate dentist reaction to lazy and legacy programming conventions, like abbreviations and underscores. I've had that sore tooth removed so that pain would never come back.
Incidently, C# is shaping up well for system tasks, with the C# .Net command-line in Vista. Hopefully the Java community will get a similar thing via Groovy at some point.
In a large company, every engineer and programmer might choose their own favourite language, to automate various tasks. Very soon you end up with an unmanaged and unmanageable environment which is held together with prestuck and sticky-taped scripts, written by ex-employees, in every language you've heard of, and some you haven't.
If I was a CIO, i would have everything done in one language (Java of course), everything managed and versioned in Subversion, and everything documented, ie. javadoc'ed.
And a great way to encourage employees to write overview documentation (in addition to javadocs) is to have a technical company newsletter or blog - and incentivise and reward submissions, with gift vouchers, public praise, and "get out of the dentist's chair free" cards - you know, the important things in life!
But LAMP hackers are real men and use vi innit. They don't want or need an IDE, or strict conventions. The problem is that in large teams, some programmers are veteran gurus of the system, while others are one-month newbies (which might be future veteran gurus, or otherwise working for your competition). Now those newbies want IDEs, to navigate the (javadoc'ed) code with ease, to be prompted with method names, etcetera. And you, the CIO, want to help them help you - show them the Netbeans!
Having those fantastic hackers that Paul Graham waxes lyrically about, is great, until they leave the company to go and work for Google. And leave fantastically terse, undocumented code, behind. To make their newbie replacement's life a spaghetti hell for a few months. Time for the dentist!
Another thing Damien mentions, is cutting and pasting. I think that API's, and superclasses and such, should be blindingly simple. Because it's difficult to predict how you might want to (re)use them in future. So if you build in functionality you need for your current problem, that might render that superclass unsuitable later, for a different unforeseen case. And in trying to change that superclass, or API, you tend to break older code that has been working fine.
So cutting and pasting can serve to isolate code, to make it safe from the rug being pulled out from under it later. An (over-engineered) superclass or API, that is great today, might be a sore tooth tomorrow...
Update. Check my blog "A Fool's Errand" which follows on from this, and introduces an upcoming series "Bin Bash Java" inspired by this blog entry.