Skip to main content

[webtier] Re: Jsr199JavaCompiler possible memory leak?

1 reply [Last post]
Anonymous

Reply viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Jan Luehe

Hi Dominic,

On 01/14/09 16:01, Dominic McGinnis wrote:
> On this note is the JSR199 in-memory compiler used as the default
> compiler for v2ur2 using JDK 1.6?
Yes.
> From my understanding that appears to be the case, but I'm having
> trouble finding any documentation that states this as a fact.
>
> Also if so, how does one bypass this and fall back to using the non
> in-memory compiler?

I don't think there is any way to fall back to the ant-based compiler
when using JDK 1.6,
but I will let Kin-man confirm.

Thanks!

Jan

>
> Thanks,
> Dominic
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* "glassfish@javadesktop.org"
> *To:* users@glassfish.dev.java.net
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 14, 2009 2:14:26 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Jsr199JavaCompiler possible memory leak?
>
> No worries, glad to help.
> [Message sent by forum member 'finbarro' (finbarro)]
>
> http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=326074
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@glassfish.dev.java.net
>
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>
>

[att1.html]