Skip to main content

Re: [JAI-IMAGEIO] Re: problem while compiling jpeg-ls compression

3 replies [Last post]
Anonymous

Endre,

I'm a complete by stander on this exchange of word so maybe I should
stay
away least I get mud on my face.

Don't want to take any sides here and being on expert on the
subject matter I won't comment on that.

However, I've been a member and a follower of this list for
years and I've never seen this sort of behaviour before here,
and don't wish to see it again.

And it was you, a stranger to and a first timer on the list, that
started this with tone of voice and amplitude that I find
irritating and offensive. Especially when directed towards
a long time contributor and helpful person on the list.
Although I do not care for his choice of words I can syphatice
with him given the nature of your ambush.

If you have something positive to contribute, please do so in
acceptable language and maner.

br Kusti

>>> List@stolsvik.com 12.1.2008 18:31:38 >>>
robert engels wrote:
> Maybe English is not your first language, but you are an idiot
> regardless. You quoted a completely different sentence. The partial
> paragraph I refered to states:
>
> Looking at user requirements, particularly those of the medical
imaging
> business which was concerned about potential large errors being
> introduced through lossy compression, the scope of the new standard
was
> defined as effective lossless and near lossless compression of
> continuous-tone, grey scale and colour still images. By near
lossless,
> it was agreed that a scheme was needed that guaranteed a maximum
error
> between the original image data and the reconstructed image data.
>
> You are an idiot, and STFU.

I just showed you another place in the same text where the authors used

the same word, trying to compare and contrast for you. But that
obviously utterly failed.

>
> On an important an related note, I the years I have been on this
list, I
> have never heard anything from you, and I have contributed (including

> patches). The only time you speak up is to criticize an answer, yet
> offer no answers yourself (even if as you say you KNEW the answer).
>
> This makes you a Jackass.

I saw the thread while doing a full-through of my email, got
interested,
and then found your answer. I believed it was incorrect, checked this
fact, and found that it was indeed absolutely incorrect. I posted this

information, as you might remember. Your authoritative voice in stating

this _false fact_ was rather annoying, and that did color my post
"somewhat".

>
> You are ignored.

Whatever. I'll at least check every single "fact" you state on this
list
before believing it, that's for sure.

Thanks,
Endre.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai-imageio.dev.java.net

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai-imageio.dev.java.net

Reply viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Andrey Kuznetsov

Kustaa,

unfortunately, this is NOT the first time on this list.
Ironie is that Robert did exactly same thing with me.

Note also that although Endre started,
but Robert's expessions are much more insulting.

I think that it does not matter how long is somebody on the list - this
is NOT usenet.

Andrey

Kustaa Nyholm schrieb:
> Endre,
>
> I'm a complete by stander on this exchange of word so maybe I should
> stay
> away least I get mud on my face.
>
> Don't want to take any sides here and being on expert on the
> subject matter I won't comment on that.
>
> However, I've been a member and a follower of this list for
> years and I've never seen this sort of behaviour before here,
> and don't wish to see it again.
>
> And it was you, a stranger to and a first timer on the list, that
> started this with tone of voice and amplitude that I find
> irritating and offensive. Especially when directed towards
> a long time contributor and helpful person on the list.
> Although I do not care for his choice of words I can syphatice
> with him given the nature of your ambush.
>
> If you have something positive to contribute, please do so in
> acceptable language and maner.
>
> br Kusti
>
>
>
>>>> List@stolsvik.com 12.1.2008 18:31:38 >>>
>>>>
> robert engels wrote:
>
>> Maybe English is not your first language, but you are an idiot
>> regardless. You quoted a completely different sentence. The partial
>> paragraph I refered to states:
>>
>> Looking at user requirements, particularly those of the medical
>>
> imaging
>
>> business which was concerned about potential large errors being
>> introduced through lossy compression, the scope of the new standard
>>
> was
>
>> defined as effective lossless and near lossless compression of
>> continuous-tone, grey scale and colour still images. By near
>>
> lossless,
>
>> it was agreed that a scheme was needed that guaranteed a maximum
>>
> error
>
>> between the original image data and the reconstructed image data.
>>
>> You are an idiot, and STFU.
>>
>
> I just showed you another place in the same text where the authors used
>
> the same word, trying to compare and contrast for you. But that
> obviously utterly failed.
>
>
>> On an important an related note, I the years I have been on this
>>
> list, I
>
>> have never heard anything from you, and I have contributed (including
>>
>
>
>> patches). The only time you speak up is to criticize an answer, yet
>> offer no answers yourself (even if as you say you KNEW the answer).
>>
>> This makes you a Jackass.
>>
>
> I saw the thread while doing a full-through of my email, got
> interested,
> and then found your answer. I believed it was incorrect, checked this
> fact, and found that it was indeed absolutely incorrect. I posted this
>
> information, as you might remember. Your authoritative voice in stating
>
> this _false fact_ was rather annoying, and that did color my post
> "somewhat".
>
>
>> You are ignored.
>>
>
> Whatever. I'll at least check every single "fact" you state on this
> list
> before believing it, that's for sure.
>
> Thanks,
> Endre.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai-imageio.dev.java.net

Julie Zachman

Please let's keep the name calling off this list. If you need to defend yourself of course you should do so, but there is no need to ratchet up the insults. As Audrey says, this is not usenet.

Julie

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrey Kuznetsov [mailto:ak@imagero.com]
Sent: Sun 1/13/2008 12:40 PM
To: interest@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
Subject: [JAI-IMAGEIO] Re: [?? Probable Spam] Re: [JAI-IMAGEIO] Re: problem while compiling jpeg-lscompression

Kustaa,

unfortunately, this is NOT the first time on this list.
Ironie is that Robert did exactly same thing with me.

Note also that although Endre started,
but Robert's expessions are much more insulting.

I think that it does not matter how long is somebody on the list - this
is NOT usenet.

Andrey

Kustaa Nyholm schrieb:
> Endre,
>
> I'm a complete by stander on this exchange of word so maybe I should
> stay
> away least I get mud on my face.
>
> Don't want to take any sides here and being on expert on the
> subject matter I won't comment on that.
>
> However, I've been a member and a follower of this list for
> years and I've never seen this sort of behaviour before here,
> and don't wish to see it again.
>
> And it was you, a stranger to and a first timer on the list, that
> started this with tone of voice and amplitude that I find
> irritating and offensive. Especially when directed towards
> a long time contributor and helpful person on the list.
> Although I do not care for his choice of words I can syphatice
> with him given the nature of your ambush.
>
> If you have something positive to contribute, please do so in
> acceptable language and maner.
>
> br Kusti
>
>
>
>>>> List@stolsvik.com 12.1.2008 18:31:38 >>>
>>>>
> robert engels wrote:
>
>> Maybe English is not your first language, but you are an idiot
>> regardless. You quoted a completely different sentence. The partial
>> paragraph I refered to states:
>>
>> Looking at user requirements, particularly those of the medical
>>
> imaging
>
>> business which was concerned about potential large errors being
>> introduced through lossy compression, the scope of the new standard
>>
> was
>
>> defined as effective lossless and near lossless compression of
>> continuous-tone, grey scale and colour still images. By near
>>
> lossless,
>
>> it was agreed that a scheme was needed that guaranteed a maximum
>>
> error
>
>> between the original image data and the reconstructed image data.
>>
>> You are an idiot, and STFU.
>>
>
> I just showed you another place in the same text where the authors used
>
> the same word, trying to compare and contrast for you. But that
> obviously utterly failed.
>
>
>> On an important an related note, I the years I have been on this
>>
> list, I
>
>> have never heard anything from you, and I have contributed (including
>>
>
>
>> patches). The only time you speak up is to criticize an answer, yet
>> offer no answers yourself (even if as you say you KNEW the answer).
>>
>> This makes you a Jackass.
>>
>
> I saw the thread while doing a full-through of my email, got
> interested,
> and then found your answer. I believed it was incorrect, checked this
> fact, and found that it was indeed absolutely incorrect. I posted this
>
> information, as you might remember. Your authoritative voice in stating
>
> this _false fact_ was rather annoying, and that did color my post
> "somewhat".
>
>
>> You are ignored.
>>
>
> Whatever. I'll at least check every single "fact" you state on this
> list
> before believing it, that's for sure.
>
> Thanks,
> Endre.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai-imageio.dev.java.net

[winmail.dat]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai-imageio.dev.java.net

Brian Burkhalter

Thanks for posting this. Indeed things should be kept civilized. There has
been little in the way of impolite discussion in all the years that this list
has been active and it would be nice to keep it that way.

Thanks ...

Brian

On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Julie Zachman wrote:

> Please let's keep the name calling off this list. If you need to defend yourself of course you should do so, but there is no need to ratchet up the insults. As Audrey says, this is not usenet.
>
> Julie
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrey Kuznetsov [mailto:ak@imagero.com]
> Sent: Sun 1/13/2008 12:40 PM
> To: interest@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
> Subject: [JAI-IMAGEIO] Re: [?? Probable Spam] Re: [JAI-IMAGEIO] Re: problem while compiling jpeg-lscompression
>
> Kustaa,
>
> unfortunately, this is NOT the first time on this list.
> Ironie is that Robert did exactly same thing with me.
>
> Note also that although Endre started,
> but Robert's expessions are much more insulting.
>
> I think that it does not matter how long is somebody on the list - this
> is NOT usenet.
>
> Andrey
>
>
>
> Kustaa Nyholm schrieb:
>> Endre,
>>
>> I'm a complete by stander on this exchange of word so maybe I should
>> stay
>> away least I get mud on my face.
>>
>> Don't want to take any sides here and being on expert on the
>> subject matter I won't comment on that.
>>
>> However, I've been a member and a follower of this list for
>> years and I've never seen this sort of behaviour before here,
>> and don't wish to see it again.
>>
>> And it was you, a stranger to and a first timer on the list, that
>> started this with tone of voice and amplitude that I find
>> irritating and offensive. Especially when directed towards
>> a long time contributor and helpful person on the list.
>> Although I do not care for his choice of words I can syphatice
>> with him given the nature of your ambush.
>>
>> If you have something positive to contribute, please do so in
>> acceptable language and maner.
>>
>> br Kusti
>>
>>
>>
>>>>> List@stolsvik.com 12.1.2008 18:31:38 >>>
>>>>>
>> robert engels wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe English is not your first language, but you are an idiot
>>> regardless. You quoted a completely different sentence. The partial
>>> paragraph I refered to states:
>>>
>>> Looking at user requirements, particularly those of the medical
>>>
>> imaging
>>
>>> business which was concerned about potential large errors being
>>> introduced through lossy compression, the scope of the new standard
>>>
>> was
>>
>>> defined as effective lossless and near lossless compression of
>>> continuous-tone, grey scale and colour still images. By near
>>>
>> lossless,
>>
>>> it was agreed that a scheme was needed that guaranteed a maximum
>>>
>> error
>>
>>> between the original image data and the reconstructed image data.
>>>
>>> You are an idiot, and STFU.
>>>
>>
>> I just showed you another place in the same text where the authors used
>>
>> the same word, trying to compare and contrast for you. But that
>> obviously utterly failed.
>>
>>
>>> On an important an related note, I the years I have been on this
>>>
>> list, I
>>
>>> have never heard anything from you, and I have contributed (including
>>>
>>
>>
>>> patches). The only time you speak up is to criticize an answer, yet
>>> offer no answers yourself (even if as you say you KNEW the answer).
>>>
>>> This makes you a Jackass.
>>>
>>
>> I saw the thread while doing a full-through of my email, got
>> interested,
>> and then found your answer. I believed it was incorrect, checked this
>> fact, and found that it was indeed absolutely incorrect. I posted this
>>
>> information, as you might remember. Your authoritative voice in stating
>>
>> this _false fact_ was rather annoying, and that did color my post
>> "somewhat".
>>
>>
>>> You are ignored.
>>>
>>
>> Whatever. I'll at least check every single "fact" you state on this
>> list
>> before believing it, that's for sure.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Endre.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
>
>
>

>^..^< >^..^<

Brian Burkhalter
Java Media, Imaging, and Graphics
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai-imageio.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai-imageio.dev.java.net