Skip to main content

JAI on Linux x86_64 / EM64T

8 replies [Last post]
lafrad
Offline
Joined: 2005-04-29

I am trying to locate the proper procedure to install JAI with the native libraries on a 64 bit linux machine (x86).

I am using Java 5 (1.5.0_03 x86_64).

Currently, (Just to get it working), I tried to do the binary installation (for 32 bit) into the jdk directory, but have ended up with an error:

Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no]
yes
Unpacking...
Checksumming...
0
0
This is not a proper JDK directory. Exiting install.

I realize it is a 32 bit binary on the 64 bit kernel, but, building off of other experiances, this should work appropriately...

Reply viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
lafrad
Offline
Joined: 2005-04-29

Well, I have Java 5/JAI working on my Intel 64-bit machine (Fedora Core 3), but it is all running in 32-bit compatability mode. I ran into some issues getting firefox 64 and Java 64 playing together (No Java 5 plugin for 64-bits)

So, Long story short: Firefox 32-bit is and Java 5 32 bit are running with JAI 32-bit, just fine on my 64-bit kernel.

If *anyone* can point me to a good "How To" To get all the 64-bit code running, let me know.

Bryce L Nordgren

I have not had luck with mixed mode 32-bit and 64-bit libraries on my
x86-64 platform (AMD, not Intel). The linker complains if the archicture
is different. In my experience, the entire app must be either 64 or 32
bits. My experience in this area has nothing to do with Java/JAI, but I
would expect the principle to apply.

Bryce

jai-interest@javadesktop.org wrote on 04/29/2005 12:01:07 PM:

> I am trying to locate the proper procedure to install JAI with the
> native libraries on a 64 bit linux machine (x86).
>
> I am using Java 5 (1.5.0_03 x86_64).
>
> Currently, (Just to get it working), I tried to do the binary
> installation (for 32 bit) into the jdk directory, but have ended up
> with an error:
>
> Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no]
> yes
> Unpacking...
> Checksumming...
> 0
> 0
> This is not a proper JDK directory. Exiting install.
>
> I realize it is a 32 bit binary on the 64 bit kernel, but, building
> off of other experiances, this should work appropriately...
> ---
> [Message sent by forum member 'lafrad' (Mike Hess)]
>
> http://www.javadesktop.org/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=76216&#76216
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai.dev.java.net
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai.dev.java.net

Brian Burkhalter

As announced earlier this week, 64-bit Linux binaries for JAI are available
from the jai-core project on java.net.

An alternative is to tun JAI without the native libraries. This might cost
some performance but there will be no loss of functionality.

Brian

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Bryce L Nordgren wrote:

> I have not had luck with mixed mode 32-bit and 64-bit libraries on my
> x86-64 platform (AMD, not Intel). The linker complains if the archicture
> is different. In my experience, the entire app must be either 64 or 32
> bits. My experience in this area has nothing to do with Java/JAI, but I
> would expect the principle to apply.
>
> Bryce
>
> jai-interest@javadesktop.org wrote on 04/29/2005 12:01:07 PM:
>
> > I am trying to locate the proper procedure to install JAI with the
> > native libraries on a 64 bit linux machine (x86).
> >
> > I am using Java 5 (1.5.0_03 x86_64).
> >
> > Currently, (Just to get it working), I tried to do the binary
> > installation (for 32 bit) into the jdk directory, but have ended up
> > with an error:
> >
> > Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no]
> > yes
> > Unpacking...
> > Checksumming...
> > 0
> > 0
> > This is not a proper JDK directory. Exiting install.
> >
> > I realize it is a 32 bit binary on the 64 bit kernel, but, building
> > off of other experiances, this should work appropriately...
> > ---
> > [Message sent by forum member 'lafrad' (Mike Hess)]
> >
> > http://www.javadesktop.org/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=76216&#76216
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai.dev.java.net
> > For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai.dev.java.net
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai.dev.java.net
>
>

----------------
Brian Burkhalter
Advanced Development, Graphics and Media
Software Chief Technology Office
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai.dev.java.net

Brian Burkhalter

Mike,

The JDK installers for the Unix flavors check for the existence of
./jre/lib/$ARCH and if this is not found they fail with the message you
indicate below. For testing purposes I think you might be able to dummy up the
installation by doing 'mkdir $JDK_HOME/jre/lib/i386' before running the JAI
installer.

Please let us know whether this helped.

Brian

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 jai-interest@javadesktop.org wrote:

> I am trying to locate the proper procedure to install JAI with the native libraries on a 64 bit linux machine (x86).
>
> I am using Java 5 (1.5.0_03 x86_64).
>
> Currently, (Just to get it working), I tried to do the binary installation (for 32 bit) into the jdk directory, but have ended up with an error:
>
> Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no]
> yes
> Unpacking...
> Checksumming...
> 0
> 0
> This is not a proper JDK directory. Exiting install.
>
> I realize it is a 32 bit binary on the 64 bit kernel, but, building off of other experiances, this should work appropriately...
> ---
> [Message sent by forum member 'lafrad' (Mike Hess)]
>
> http://www.javadesktop.org/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=76216&#76216
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai.dev.java.net
>
>

----------------
Brian Burkhalter
Advanced Development, Graphics and Media
Software Chief Technology Office
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai.dev.java.net

Brian Burkhalter

Mike,

The JDK installers for the Unix flavors check for the existence of
./jre/lib/$ARCH and if this is not found they fail with the message you
indicate below. For testing purposes I think you might be able to dummy up the
installation by doing 'mkdir $JDK_HOME/jre/lib/i386' before running the JAI
installer.

Please let us know whether this helped.

Brian

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 jai-interest@javadesktop.org wrote:

> I am trying to locate the proper procedure to install JAI with the native libraries on a 64 bit linux machine (x86).
>
> I am using Java 5 (1.5.0_03 x86_64).
>
> Currently, (Just to get it working), I tried to do the binary installation (for 32 bit) into the jdk directory, but have ended up with an error:
>
> Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no]
> yes
> Unpacking...
> Checksumming...
> 0
> 0
> This is not a proper JDK directory. Exiting install.
>
> I realize it is a 32 bit binary on the 64 bit kernel, but, building off of other experiances, this should work appropriately...
> ---
> [Message sent by forum member 'lafrad' (Mike Hess)]
>
> http://www.javadesktop.org/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=76216&#76216
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai.dev.java.net
>
>

----------------
Brian Burkhalter
Advanced Development, Graphics and Media
Software Chief Technology Office
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Brian Burkhalter

Mike,

We'll check this out but out of curiosity have you tried to download and build
jai-core with the 64-bit linux-amd64 binaries recently posted?

Brian

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 jai-interest@javadesktop.org wrote:

> I am trying to locate the proper procedure to install JAI with the native libraries on a 64 bit linux machine (x86).
>
> I am using Java 5 (1.5.0_03 x86_64).
>
> Currently, (Just to get it working), I tried to do the binary installation (for 32 bit) into the jdk directory, but have ended up with an error:
>
> Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no]
> yes
> Unpacking...
> Checksumming...
> 0
> 0
> This is not a proper JDK directory. Exiting install.
>
> I realize it is a 32 bit binary on the 64 bit kernel, but, building off of other experiances, this should work appropriately...
> ---
> [Message sent by forum member 'lafrad' (Mike Hess)]
>
> http://www.javadesktop.org/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=76216&#76216
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai.dev.java.net
>
>

----------------
Brian Burkhalter
Advanced Development, Graphics and Media
Software Chief Technology Office
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: interest-unsubscribe@jai.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: interest-help@jai.dev.java.net

KTD
Offline
Joined: 2011-04-15

The integration of the http://java.sun.com web site into http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tech/index.html is still a mess ;

Thanks to Google, I've found the x86_64 version of JAI at http://download.java.net/media/jai/builds/release/1_1_3
(Available since 2006)

gcstang
Offline
Joined: 2003-06-20

Thank you