Skip to main content

Do you agree with the vote to approve JSR 299 despite lingering concerns?

Yes, the remaining issues didn't need to hold up approval
43% (50 votes)
No, it should have been delayed, even if it then missed EE 6
16% (18 votes)
No, EE 6 should have been delayed to wait for 299
24% (28 votes)
No, it should not have been approved in any case
11% (13 votes)
Other (please comment)
5% (6 votes)
Total votes: 115

Comments

JSR what ?

What is JSR 299 ? If I even knew I'd probably won't care.

Lingering concerns

Check out the vote results on the JCP site. IBM voiced concerns about having another component framework and possible scope creep, Oracle voiced concern about how 299 would integrate with the rest of EE, SAP questioned integration and an overarching principle for the JSR, and Google said they expected changes to the name and package. That said, they all voted YES.

still parsing the question

I suppose to answer this you need to know a lot about the web beans back story! I'm still having trouble locating the "lingering concerns"

still parsing the question

I suppose to answer this you need to know a lot about the web beans back story! I'm still having trouble locating the "lingering concerns"