by dtbullock - 2006-02-13 05:49
by alexlamsl - 2006-02-06 12:12
by stitzl - 2006-02-09 03:07
by malcolmdavis - 2006-02-06 19:41
lol. I agree. :-)
Im sure Sun does some strong-arm tactics, as does other players. However, nobody does it better than Microsoft. Its either Microsoft's way or the highway. Regardless of what IDE you like, it is much better than a $2000 copy of VisualStudio.
by crimson_fate - 2006-02-05 09:06
by rittmey - 2006-02-08 03:45
by fabriziogiudici - 2006-02-04 04:14
by atehrani - 2006-02-03 18:53
by malcolmdavis - 2006-02-06 19:36
Eclipse has export and import of configuration settings for years.
by yagupoli - 2006-02-03 16:17
by dlevancho - 2006-02-08 12:02
by ilazarte - 2006-02-03 11:17
by sasdav - 2006-02-03 09:07
by aglynn - 2006-02-04 18:48
by malcolmdavis - 2006-02-03 09:52
I don't see this as a war, but good old competition.
The NetBeans experience 1.0-3.0 was crap. I know developers that preferred a Non-IDE to NetBeans. I haven't seen the NetBeans 5.0 on a Mac. Has NetBeans finally adapted the native look and feel on the Mac? (Eclipse is not perfect, but at least Eclipse made an effort toward native look and feel).
Interesting that other IDEs are not in the debate. IntellJ users think both Eclipse and NetBeans are lacking. For $50.00, MyEclipse turns Eclipse into a high-end enterprise application.
Everybody has a different mindset and goals. Great that NetBeans satisfies your needs. However, NetBeans 4.1 still had too many issues for me. I will download the NetBeans 5.0 and kick the tires. :-)
by ilazarte - 2006-02-03 11:21
by denka - 2006-02-06 13:34
by mmrack - 2006-02-04 13:18
by dare_devil - 2006-02-07 03:14
by bobsledbob - 2006-03-19 00:42
by dare_devil - 2006-02-07 03:10
Your use of this web site or any of its content or software indicates your agreement to be bound by these Terms of Participation.
Copyright © 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle and Java are registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.