Skip to main content

JAX-WS user Guide Regd.,

2 replies [Last post]
Anonymous

Hi All,

I'm new to java web services and I'm learning the JAX-WS tutorials.

The user guide starts with the AddNumbersImpl. I followed the steps as
mentioned. They have also mentioned apt task in the ant file. But in the
sample sources along with the distribution there is no such task in the
build.xml. Instead it has a task named annotationProcessing. Does both
refer to the same.

Is there anything which I'm referring wrong?

Reply viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Glen Mazza

Don't use Ant, use Maven:
http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/entry/web_service_tutorial,
http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/entry/blog_article_index.

Glen

On 10/14/2012 02:42 PM, selvakumar netaji wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm new to java web services and I'm learning the JAX-WS tutorials.
>
> The user guide starts with the AddNumbersImpl. I followed the steps as
> mentioned. They have also mentioned apt task in the ant file. But in
> the sample sources along with the distribution there is no such task
> in the build.xml. Instead it has a task named annotationProcessing.
> Does both refer to the same.
>
> Is there anything which I'm referring wrong?

selvakumar netaji

Hi Glen,

Will follow the steps and will get clarifications if I've any issues.

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Glen Mazza wrote:

> Don't use Ant, use Maven:
> http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/entry/web_service_tutorial,
> http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/entry/blog_article_index.
>
> Glen
>
> On 10/14/2012 02:42 PM, selvakumar netaji wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm new to java web services and I'm learning the JAX-WS tutorials.
>
> The user guide starts with the AddNumbersImpl. I followed the steps as
> mentioned. They have also mentioned apt task in the ant file. But in the
> sample sources along with the distribution there is no such task in the
> build.xml. Instead it has a task named annotationProcessing. Does both
> refer to the same.
>
> Is there anything which I'm referring wrong?
>
>
>