The Source for Java Technology Collaboration
User: Password:
Register | Login help    

Search

Online Books:
java.net on MarkMail:

Do you agree with the vote to approve JSR 299 despite lingering concerns?

Yes, the remaining issues didn't need to hold up approval
43% (50 votes)
No, it should have been delayed, even if it then missed EE 6
16% (18 votes)
No, EE 6 should have been delayed to wait for 299
24% (28 votes)
No, it should not have been approved in any case
11% (13 votes)
Other (please comment)
5% (6 votes)
Total votes: 115
»

JSR what ?

Submitted by dma02 on Mon, 2009-02-16 12:13.
What is JSR 299 ? If I even knew I'd probably won't care.

Lingering concerns

Submitted by invalidname on Fri, 2009-02-13 11:46.
Check out the vote results on the JCP site. IBM voiced concerns about having another component framework and possible scope creep, Oracle voiced concern about how 299 would integrate with the rest of EE, SAP questioned integration and an overarching principle for the JSR, and Google said they expected changes to the name and package. That said, they all voted YES.

still parsing the question

Submitted by coding on Fri, 2009-02-13 10:46.
I suppose to answer this you need to know a lot about the web beans back story! I'm still having trouble locating the "lingering concerns"

still parsing the question

Submitted by coding on Fri, 2009-02-13 10:46.
I suppose to answer this you need to know a lot about the web beans back story! I'm still having trouble locating the "lingering concerns"




 

Feedback  | FAQ  | Press | Terms of Use
Privacy  |  Trademarks | Site Map
 
Your use of this web site or any of its content or software indicates your agreement to be bound by these Terms of Participation.
 
Copyright © 1995-2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Collabnet Logo Cognisync Communities
Powered by Sun Microsystems, Inc.,
CollabNet and Cognisync