The Source for Java Technology Collaboration
User: Password:
Register | Login help    

Search

Online Books:
java.net on MarkMail:


Do you use static code analysis?

Yes, as a regular part of my development process
29% (144 votes)
Yes, but not regularly
27% (135 votes)
No, but I'd like to
18% (90 votes)
No, I don't think it's useful
6% (29 votes)
No, I don't know what it is
20% (100 votes)
Something else (please comment)
1% (4 votes)
Total votes: 502

Too cumbersome... for now.

I'd like to use them more. But frankly, the plugins to the various IDE's never seem to work and it's too cumbersome running them manually / messing with toolchains.

IntelliJ

Does IntelliJ qualify? It does need compiled files, but it's analysis of parsed code is so insightful. It is gently, but persuasively encouraging in enforcing code with no warnings, since having file lit "green" is so rewarding.

IntelliJ

it does NOT need compiled files, sorry

about maven

How to write in maven our own plugin

FindBugs rules

Yep, FindBugs is da bomb. What really amazes me about it is the nearly 0 false positive rate. It also integrates nicely with ant.

Maven

LastYear i stick my Nose into Maven 2. There it is so easy to install PlugIns like PMD, Findbugs,Checkstyle or Cobertura and more....