Showing messages 1 through 7 of 7.

• Tiffany jewellery
  2009-07-02 22:50:47 luckey_001 [Reply | View]
  
  Tiffany Earrings are made in high quality and magnificent design. In our Tiffanysjewellery rings collection, you can find classical, elegant and various styles of rings. And all rings sizes range from 5 to 11 US size.Tiffanys jewellery is your best Tiffany Jewellery Silver jewelry online store.In tiffanys jewellery online necklace store, You can chase after every kind of Links of London you want, such as Silver Necklaces, Heart Necklaces, Beaded necklaces and Chain necklaces. The necklace styles are from classic to modern, and there must be one type to fit you.Tiffany Charms. The trusted details. A permanent part of your everyday life. Tiffanys jewellery presents you with exclusive creations of Tiffany Jewelry that telegraph urban style, sophistication and a discerning eye.
  <hr>
  
  
  

• SVG
  2008-03-23 22:22:04 will69 [Reply | View]
  
  Can somebody please explain why we need JavaFX or XAML, when we already have SVG? KDE4 uses SVG for GUIs. Seems like a clever choice to me. It's a mature standard. It's very well supported. You can do stunning FX in SVG.

• Wrong place to ask?
  2007-08-23 12:29:50 andreasst [Reply | View]
  
  I think java.net is the wrong place to ask this question. JavaFX should be a good tool for non-programmers. It should be powerful for designers. Similar like HDi is preferred over BD-Java by designers.

• Groovy
  2007-08-23 00:25:59 strulli [Reply | View]
  
  I'm more interested in grovvy, on the other hand JavaFX will be first choice on mobiles in the future.

• Definitely Interested, but waiting...
  2007-08-22 02:47:36 archangel [Reply | View]
  
  I'm definitely interested in learning it, but I'm waiting until the language and tools(?!) are established and I stand a chance of building a complete app which my company can use.
  
  As I heard James Ward say in a presentation: JavaFX looks very promising, but you can develop Flex applications today.
• Definitely Interested, but waiting...
  2007-09-05 10:37:32 jlward4th [Reply | View]
  
  

  As I heard James Ward say in a presentation: JavaFX looks very promising, but you can develop Flex applications today.

  
  
  As a language JavaFX is promising because it does what Flex does... Create a simple declarative language for UI development. This is the topic of Bruce Eckel's "Hybridizing Java" article. There are quite a few places where JavaFX and Flex are different. These differences cause there to be distinct places where each technology is useful. I'm working on a blog that will discuss these differences but until then another good read / listen might be the interview I did with Artima at JavaOne:
  Flex and JavaFX
  
  James Ward
  jamesward.org

• Better Java
  2007-08-21 11:04:59 tackline [Reply | View]
  
  I'm quite interested in what Java can learn from JavaFX. Particularly if something can be done about JavaBeans.