Do you use static code analysis?
Yes, as a regular part of my development process
29% (144 votes)
Yes, but not regularly
27% (135 votes)
No, but I'd like to
18% (90 votes)
No, I don't think it's useful
6% (29 votes)
No, I don't know what it is
20% (100 votes)
Something else (please comment)
1% (4 votes)
Total votes: 502
- Printer-friendly version
- 697 reads
- Login or register to post comments




Comments
Too cumbersome... for now.
by mrmorris - 2008-07-31 09:19
I'd like to use them more. But frankly, the plugins to the various IDE's never seem to work and it's too cumbersome running them manually / messing with toolchains.IntelliJ
by denka - 2008-07-29 14:07
Does IntelliJ qualify? It does need compiled files, but it's analysis of parsed code is so insightful. It is gently, but persuasively encouraging in enforcing code with no warnings, since having file lit "green" is so rewarding.IntelliJ
by denka - 2008-07-29 14:08
it does NOT need compiled files, sorryabout maven
by prashantpm - 2008-07-28 22:40
How to write in maven our own pluginFindBugs rules
by dkkopp - 2008-07-28 09:06
Yep, FindBugs is da bomb. What really amazes me about it is the nearly 0 false positive rate. It also integrates nicely with ant.Maven
by mac_systems - 2008-07-27 12:17
LastYear i stick my Nose into Maven 2. There it is so easy to install PlugIns like PMD, Findbugs,Checkstyle or Cobertura and more....