The Source for Java Technology Collaboration
User: Password:



Start New Message Post a Reply

Subject:  No stupid invasive changes
Date:  2008-01-15 12:09:22
From:  dog
Response to: No stupid invasive changes


I dunno.. there are people that have all sorts of experience w/Parallel languages that know the answer to this. I sure don't.

I just say change if you need to.. but don't just change for change sake. But an example of why you may want a syntax change is the parallel for-statement Fortress has.. But maybe anonymous classes could be used as closures to support that parallelism.


 Feed java.net RSS Feeds